Many company CEOs and CFOs today spend a good deal of time working the banking environment. Many of our client companies are performing at very good levels. Some are interested in taking advantage of acquisition opportunities; others in growth plans with new products and new markets. Some are looking for the opportunity to hedge the risk and perhaps take a few chips off the table. Other have good performing companies, but have issues with their balance sheet.
I have been surprised at how few business owners, CEOs and CFOs are aware of MINORITY RECAPS as a potential means for growth capital, taking a few chips off the table, and possibly providing for balance sheet stabilization. We recommend consideration of minority recaps.
Minority recapitalizations (Minority Recaps) - Owners of mid-market and family-owned companies can sell less than 50 percent of their shares at minimal, or no, minority discount and still retain control.
Owners of mid-market and family-owned companies can sell less than 50 percent of their shares at minimal, or no, minority discount and still retain control; they can receive cash for their shares; they can use debt, as well as equity, to enhance returns; they can keep a significant equity tranche for a second exit - when market conditions might again be peaking; and they can pursue an aggressive and ongoing business plan designed to stimulate organic growth and finance acquisitions. This allows private company owners to lower risk by lowering the personal financial concentration they have in their business through diversification.
Common Myth
A common myth is that all private equity firms want control. While that may have been true ten years ago, in today's environment, many PE firms are enthusiastic about teaming up with management to grow good companies with less than a controlling interest.
Minority recaps are not an appropriate for every business owner
The company needs to have the following characteristics:
• Good operating performance (cash flow and revenue growth
• Good management team
• Strategic Growth Plan (tangible opportunities for growth)
For those companies that meet these parameters, it might be just the ticket.
Second bite of the apple can be better and sweeter than the first.
For those companies that sell a minority stake with opportunities to grow, the results can be compelling. In many cases, partnering with the right private equity firm can provide growth that is many times higher than the company could have achieved without outside capital. When the company is ready to sell in an additional five years, perhaps, the owner can reap significantly higher returns.
Example:
Five years ago a client of ours was doing $26 M in revenue with good margins and cash flow. The owner wanted to expand beyond the region into other markets with new products, but lacked the capital and financial expertise. We helped the company develop a strategic growth and execution plan and shored up some weaknesses to present the company in its best light. We assisted the company in finding experienced, knowledgeable resources to help. The company sold 35% interest to a private equity firm. The owner was able to take a few million of his ships off the table ( his family was very happy that his exposure was lowered) and still had significant capital to expand. The private equity firm assisted with introductions, and recommended the addition of a terrific CFO and a strong VP of Operations. The company last year recorded over $130M in revenue. That second bite 65% share was worth a lot more than it was five years ago. The owner had this to say: "I had heard terrible things about private equity. But these guys really became our partners and helped us become a better company. Thanks to Mead Consulting for helping us get it done with the right team."
Market Challenges
The current market offers interesting challenges. But some companies will be able to navigate these waters and put themselves in a lasting competitive position. Think about how your company could gain with capital to acquire and grow during a period when everyone else is in the bunker with their heads down. One caution - before embarking on this path, seek help from those professionals with experience working with mid-size companies in your position. If you would like more information on minority recaps please contact me.
Thoughts from Dave Mead and discussion about issues and concerns for Small and Mid-size Businesses. Some discussion topics will include strategic planning and execution, improving profitability and cash flow, maximizing value for exit.
Monday, May 18, 2015
Thursday, March 26, 2015
Five ways for you to fail - Using customer profitability to become customer-centric Part 2
Part 2 - Using customer profitability to become customer-centric
Five ways for you to fail
Five ways for you to fail
[Editor's Note: This is Part 2 of a series on customer profitability. I hope you find it useful. - dpm]
We
hate to present things in negative terms. However, many companies try
hard to be customer-centric, but their efforts fail to add value to the
company. Frequently, they commit some - and sometimes all - of the
following sins:
DENIAL
Do you insist that the differences in the profitability of your customers aren't important or aren't measurable with current systems? Do you deny that you have unprofitable customers? If you try to calculate customer profitability, do you exclude some operating or capital costs? Does every cost in your company get allocated to a customer?
Do you insist that the differences in the profitability of your customers aren't important or aren't measurable with current systems? Do you deny that you have unprofitable customers? If you try to calculate customer profitability, do you exclude some operating or capital costs? Does every cost in your company get allocated to a customer?
THE GROWTH ILLUSION
Are you adding lots of new customers without knowing how much they cost to acquire or how long they're likely to stay? Most important, do you know about the economic profit (operating profit minus a capital charge) you can expect from each new customer?
Are you adding lots of new customers without knowing how much they cost to acquire or how long they're likely to stay? Most important, do you know about the economic profit (operating profit minus a capital charge) you can expect from each new customer?
THE ILLUSION OF AVERAGES
Do you make decisions based on average customer profitability (profitability by segments or markets)? Are you aware of how much profit comes from the best 20% and the worst 20% of your customer? Are you unsure about which specific elements of customer behavior cause customers to fall into the top and bottom groups?
Do you make decisions based on average customer profitability (profitability by segments or markets)? Are you aware of how much profit comes from the best 20% and the worst 20% of your customer? Are you unsure about which specific elements of customer behavior cause customers to fall into the top and bottom groups?
FAILURE TO ACT Do
you fail to make specific managers fully accountable for acting on
customer profitability? Is your strategic plan disconnected from the
economic profitability of customers?
FAILURE TO DRIVE COMPANY VALUE
Have you stopped short of figuring out how much each customer segment contributes to your share price or overall company value? Have you told your board and your stakeholders how you're using your knowledge of customer profitability?
Have you stopped short of figuring out how much each customer segment contributes to your share price or overall company value? Have you told your board and your stakeholders how you're using your knowledge of customer profitability?
Focusing
on customer profitability is key to becoming a truly customer-centric
organization. Calculating net profitability by customer is the start.
Sustainable improvement to company performance requires changes to
strategy, structure, organization, culture, and measurements.
Improvement
can start immediately! The good news is that many of our small and
middle market business clients see measurable profit increase within the
first three months of implementation.
Thursday, March 5, 2015
Congratulations to Mark Phillips and the SLI Global Solutions team on the sale to GLI Group
SLI Global Solutions Joins the GLI Group of Companies
LAKEWOOD, N.J. (March 2, 2015) – The Gaming Labs International group of companies is pleased to announce the addition of SLI Global Solutions (SLI), a leader in Quality Assurance and Software Testing Services, to its growing portfolio of companies. With this acquisition, SLI Global Solutions and GLI combine to form one of the largest organizations with a singular focus on software testing and quality assurance worldwide.GLI President/CEO James Maida said, “Just as GLI is recognized for its global leadership in gaming testing and professional services, SLI has long been recognized as the leader in government solutions; testing for certification of health IT, and voting system certification testing; software testing and quality assurance. Those similarities extend to the culture of each company. With testing and certification at our core, both GLI and SLI have shared beliefs in excellence, passion and commitment to our clients and to providing the best services available anywhere. Moving forward together, we will share that culture and commitment to excellence, providing even more customers with broader levels of testing, certification and professional services.”
SLI President Mark Phillips said, “SLI has built a scalable delivery model using documented and repeatable processes delivered by highly credentialed and experienced staff and enhanced by innovative tools and techniques. Because of this, SLI has been able to provide significant value to both private and public sector clients as they develop their most strategic IT products. We are excited to join the GLI family of companies to rapidly scale and deliver these solutions to a much broader range of clients.”
SLI ensures information technology investments result in products that are built according to agreed upon standards, perform as expected, and fulfill business needs. Together, GLI and SLI will represent one of the world's largest providers exclusively dedicated to quality assurance, technology testing and IT governance-related solutions.
SLI brings a broad portfolio of services and solutions to GLI including world class software test automation, quality assurance, and independent verification and validation for commercial and government agencies. SLI has earned a number of designations including an ISO 9001:2008 certification for its Quality Management System and ISO/IEC 17025:2005 accreditation for software testing for electronic health records and voting systems. SLI leads the industry with its own proprietary quality management methodology, SQM3, which is based on practical applications of IEEE, PMI and ISO standards.
About SLI Global Solutions:
Since 1996, SLI Global Solutions has been helping customers manage their technology risks and investments. As a company that has earned an ISO 9001:2008 certification for its Quality Management Systems and ISO 17025 accreditation for all laboratory work, we provide software testing, quality assurance (QA), and independent verification and validation (IV&V) for commercial and government agency clients that are based upon our proprietary quality management methodology, SQM3.
www.sliglobalsolutions.com.
About Gaming Laboratories International:
For 25 years, Gaming Laboratories International, LLC has continuously delivered THE best quality land-based and iGaming testing and consulting services with supreme accuracy while reducing time to market. With 20 laboratory locations spread across Africa, Asia, Australia, the Caribbean, Europe, North America and South America, GLI is the only global organization of its kind to hold U.S. and international accreditations for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025, 17020, and 17065 standards for technical competence in the gaming, wagering and lottery industries. For more information, visit www.gaminglabs.com.
# # #
GLI Contact: Christie Eickelman, Vice President of Worldwide Marketing
+1 (702) 914-2220, c.eickelman@gaminglabs.com
SLI Contact: Cassandra Pierce, Market Operations/Recruiting
+1 (303) 575-6881, x161, cpierce@sliglobalsolutions.com
hillips
Wednesday, March 4, 2015
Using customer profitability to become customer-centric
[Editor’s Note: We initially published this eLetter in 2002. Since that time, we have assisted many clients in gaining a better understanding of their customers and profitability. I hope you find it useful. – dpm]
Some companies calculate the net profitability of every one of their customers every month! Why? Because they have discovered that the company profitability is built “one customer at a time” and that all customers are not the same.
What should be included in your calculation?
Every cost in a company should be allocated to a customer. In a manufacturing company, for example, costs should include the product cost, freight and delivery, cost of generating and processing an order and collecting from the customer (from sales, sales support, customer service, technical service, order entry, scheduling, rent, warehousing, picking, staging and loading, insurance, accounting, credit and collections, terms, warranty costs, cost of capital for plant, equipment, information technology), R&D, and corporate overhead.
Why spend so much effort at this micro level?…Because companies have discovered that examining profitability at the customer level provides not only amazing data about the cost of acquiring, servicing, and maintaining customers, but perhaps most importantly can provide insight into new product and service opportunities to gain a better share of their best, most profitable customers.
Cost of serving customers. One of our distribution clients found that, due to the cost of processing and special packaging an order, order size was a far greater determinant of profitability than gross margin. Product and pricing was adjusted to reflect the value of special packaging, while introducing new standard packaging that covered a broader number of customer needs.
Cost of acquiring new customers. Another client discovered that marketing programs that were designed to grow revenue were inherently flawed. One program, (judged a great success since it added $7 million in revenue by the second year) added customers that cost $2,000 to acquire, but who only generated $1,350 of profit during their tenure as a customer. In truth the company lost $650 on each new customer acquired under this program.
Insights into best customers. Opportunities to cross-sell additional services and products. One client found that its best customers in the construction trade were notoriously poor planners and had difficulties forecasting demand. By providing a rather basic scheduling service for these clients, it now provides better service at lower costs and charges a premium price. It has solved a real issue of pain for both customer and supplier …AND…with the increased knowledge about the customer’s needs, it has begun to develop and sell additional products to their best customers.
Calculating Profitability per customer does not require a significant new investment in Information Technology or Accounting Systems? Most of the small and middle market businesses we work with have implemented some form of customer tracking software and cost tracking software(CRM, Manufacturing, Order Processing, etc….some may have Activity Based Costing) which is sufficient to get started. Following the customer interaction through the company’s business processes and establishing some cost allocations is the next step. This is an iterative process with calculations and allocations improving over time. Typically, the segmenting of customers by profitability is easy to discern and companies find that they can begin to implement measures quickly.
Focusing on customer profitability is key to becoming a truly customer-centric organization. Calculating net profitability by customer is the start – sustainable improvement to company performance requires changes to strategy, structure, organization, culture, and measurements.
Companies are generating outsized improvements. Mead Consulting clients that have embraced customer profitability have enjoyed significant improvements in performance both in revenue as well as profitability. To see more information on some of our client improvements, visit our client success stories page.
In work with our clients, we utilize proven methods designed to center the business around customer profitability. If you would like more information, please contact me.
Monday, February 9, 2015
Seven traits of Colorado success stories. Why some companies grow and others get stuck.
[Editor's Note: Over the past seven years, we have met with the CEOs or owners of over 200 private Colorado companies. These companies range from new technologies, products and services in such diverse fields as education, web conferencing, technology, construction, trucking, logistics, medical devices, outsourced services, among others. Some of these companies are growing - some quite rapidly; others are stagnant or stuck.]
Why are there such differences? Certainly companies that depend on some industries such as homebuilding or construction were severely impacted by the economic downturn. However, blaming stagnancy solely on economic malaise is an oversimplification. The recession – and subsequent “selective recovery” has highlighted the differences between the good, well-managed companies from those others whose fortunes rise and fall with the economy. We have found that industry, size, and the overall economy are not necessarily the determinants of company success.
Companies that have become "Colorado success stories" share certain traits. While this is not intended to be an all-encompassing list, this list is intended to provoke some thought about what breeds success.
1. Lifestyle or Equity Value. How many of you have ever been involved with a company where the owner was conflicted about current compensation or cash flow vs. investment for the future?
Be clear with what type of company you want to be. A lifestyle company can allow the owner to call his/her own shots and to move at his/her own pace. It is run for the cash flow and lifestyle benefits of the owner(s). In an equity value company, the owner strives to build real assets with a scalable, tangible value that can be bought and sold. This leader is willing to sacrifice some short-term gains in order to invest in growing the market value of the business. These “equity value” owners focus more on building value as seen by potential buyers: sustained improvements in revenue/EBITDA, and a strong management team that can operate and grow the business without the owner's constant involvement.
There is no right or wrong answer to the lifestyle vs. equity value question, but owners must be clear in the distinction. Straddling both lifestyle and equity value camps is sure to generate both lower current cash (compensation for the owners) as well as lower growth and value potential (lower equity value).
Below are some of the characteristics of Lifestyle vs. Equity Value companies. Lifestyle companies tend to have a short –term focus; they tend to run at the owner’s pace or comfort level. Investment in the business may be secondary to a passion of the owner, such funding the as sponsorship of a team, or sport, or the arts. While these companies may have some elements of other management styles, in the end, there is a centralized nature to decision-making and authority. Likewise, since there may be limited empowerment or upward mobility for managers, high performers are not attracted to Lifestyle companies, or do not remain. See the article “Which do you have – a Lifestyle Business or an Equity Value business?”
Table 1
| Lifestyle | Equity Value | |
| Focus | Short-term Lifestyle; Run for Owner’s compensation | Long-term Equity Value; sacrifice short –term comp |
| Pace | Owner’s pace | Dictated by desired outcome |
| Management style | Command & Control; Centralized | Decentralized; individual decision-making |
| Owner Management | Can tend to be viewed as inconsistent, capricious and changing | Consistent with overall strategy and core values |
| Expense Control/Spending decisions | Tightly controlled at top | Managed through approved dept budgets and policies |
| Outside Capital | Debt; Investors not interested; Growth may be restricted due to availability of capital | Equity investors |
| Empowerment | Limited; Loyalty Rewarded; Small circle of trust | Expansive; Performance rewarded; Systems to enhance empowerment |
| Objectives | May change at owner whim | Clearly outlined; transparent |
| Employee Equity | No | Yes; equity awarded |
| Career Development | Limited upside | Significant upside |
| Employee Capability | “Steady Eddies” Thrive here | High performers thrive here |
| Sale of Business | Usually only to Employees or Family | To third-party Buyers (Strategic or Financial) |
2. Empower employees. Companies can't grow beyond a certain point if all of the real decision-making stays in the hands of the owner or a small group of managers. Growth companies look to empower employees to make decisions. They also develop a culture that allows employees to make mistakes and a mechanism so that they can learn and grow from the mistakes.
3. Hire for the next level. Companies that want to grow understand that they need talent that can manage at the next level. Successful companies hire people who can grow 1-2 levels higher in the organization so that the talent pool is constantly being strengthened. These companies also understand that paying more for top talent more than pays for itself.
4. Develop flexible strategies you can execute well. Traditional approaches to planning and execution assume away uncertainties and set a fixed plan in place for a year or more. Successful companies are developing multiple possible views of the future, developing a plan and actions, then revisiting the plan every 8-12 weeks to adjust to changes in the market or the competitive landscape. Otterbox, the designer and marketer of protective cases for smartphones, has grown from $15M revenue in 2008 to approx. $1B revenue with a flexible approach that re-evaluates all strategic operating plans every 6-8 weeks for possible adjustment. Other companies are utilizing scenario planning to develop and “rehearse” their responses to different possible future states in order to maximize their competitive position. See our article “Why every company should be doing scenario planning” and the 5-part series on Scenario Planning.
5. Develop an adaptable organization. Successful companies focus on creating a culture of adaptability. They develop an organization, and leadership that can react quickly and make necessary course corrections in response to market opportunities. See the article “Adapt is new thinking” and the 7-part series on Creating an Adaptable Organization.
6. Focus on a superior customer experience. Dan King of ReadyTalk calls it developing "emotionally-connected" clients; Maria Vogt and Sonya Yungeberg of government contractor, Ayuda Management, call it "under-promising and over-delivering". These companies focus on wowing the customer and build systems and hire and reward people who want to delight the customer with every interaction. Engagement of customers is key.
7. Play offense instead of defense. If you do anything long enough it becomes a habit; then it becomes part of your culture. Many companies have created defensive cultures with several years of cost-cutting and deferring or eliminating new projects and new products. "NO" has become the operating word for "stuck" companies. Successful companies look for opportunities to develop and test new business models, new products and new projects. They see the market as ripe with opportunities to grow and innovate. "HOW" is their operating mantra.
Conclusion: Examine your company. Do you live the traits of successful companies?
Let us know your thoughts.
Thursday, January 22, 2015
Congratulations to Pete Stevenson and the team at Latisys on the announced sale to Zayo
Congratulations to Pete Stevenson and the team at Latisys on the announced sale to Zayo.
Zayo Group Holdings Inc. agreed to buy Latisys Holdings LLC for $675 million, the telecom operator’s second-largest acquisition and its biggest move yet into data centers.
Zayo specializes in leasing so-called dark, or unused, fiber-optic cables to companies that want to expand their networks to cellphone towers and data centers such as those owned by Latisys. The deal would enable Zayo to sell more network bandwidth to Latisys’s enterprise customers while marketing its expanded data-center footprint to existing Zayo customers... More...
For more on Latisys, read the Colorado success stories article from Colorado Biz magazine
Friday, January 16, 2015
Congratulations to Bev Freedman, Bob Malone and the team at The Assist Group on the sale to strategic buyer Equian
Congratulations to Bev Freedman, Bob Malone and the team at The Assist Group on its successful sale to strategic buyer, Equian.
The Assist Group, based in Lakewood, ClinAssist® claims review process identifies improper hospital costs, providing comprehensive data and significant savings to payers. As a leader in complex claims review and resolution, TAG offers payers a complete solution – from initial screening through final resolution. The comprehensive claims resolution service supports findings, allowing payers to avoid reimbursing facilities for inappropriate billed charges. Results have produced an unprecedented uphold rate for identified billing errors, saving payers virtually millions of dollars each year. Leveraging TAG's extensive claims compliance experience, it also offers a negotiated discount option that enables payers to retain their existing facility discount and realize additional significant pre-payment savings, while complying with the strictest of payment deadlines.
The Assist Group, based in Lakewood, ClinAssist® claims review process identifies improper hospital costs, providing comprehensive data and significant savings to payers. As a leader in complex claims review and resolution, TAG offers payers a complete solution – from initial screening through final resolution. The comprehensive claims resolution service supports findings, allowing payers to avoid reimbursing facilities for inappropriate billed charges. Results have produced an unprecedented uphold rate for identified billing errors, saving payers virtually millions of dollars each year. Leveraging TAG's extensive claims compliance experience, it also offers a negotiated discount option that enables payers to retain their existing facility discount and realize additional significant pre-payment savings, while complying with the strictest of payment deadlines.
Indianapolis-headquartered Equian is a healthcare information
services company focused on lowering the cost of care by eliminating waste
through integrated payment integrity solutions.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)